honestly im so over my adapted ef 75-300 its just blurry trash and im missing every shot of the hawks near my house. my logic was the rf 200-800 for the extra reach but then i thought maybe the 100-500 is sharper? I got $1900 to spend before my montana trip... what actually works on the r7?
You might want to consider how heavy that Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM actually is before hiking Montana. Its a beast. I would suggest looking for a used Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM instead because it handles the R7 sensor way better. Be careful with f/9 on that 800mm though... it gets noisy fast when the light drops.