Helen is 100 percent spot on about the crop factor. Since the R7 has that 1.6x multiplier, you really lose your wide angle if you use a full-frame 24mm lens because it behaves like a 38mm. For long-term ownership and pure convenience, I would actually point you toward the Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM. It is usually under $500, weighs almost nothing, and the 29-240mm equivalent range is basically perfect for travel. If you want something with higher-end internals and dont mind a bit more weight, the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM is a beast. It is right at your $900 price point and uses the Nano USM motor which is way faster and quieter for video than the standard STM lenses. It effectively turns your R7 into a 384mm telephoto machine. Basically, if you do more:

• Landscapes: Stick with the RF-S 18-150mm for the wider start.
• Street and Wildlife: Go with the 24-240mm for the extra reach. Just make sure you are comfortable with the size difference tho, the 24-240 is much chunkier!

This ^

Honestly, after shooting with my R7 for a while now, I’ve realized that choosing a "travel" lens is pretty subjective depending on what you're actually doing. The crop factor on this sensor really changes how you have to think about your focal lengths, haha. Before you drop that $1,000, I have a couple of questions to narrow it down. Are you more of a "scenery and architecture" traveler, or do you find yourself wanting to zoom way in on distant details or wildlife while you're out? Also, like, how much weight are you actually willing to carry around all day? Some of those "do-it-all" zooms can get pretty chunky after a few hours of walking, tbh, and I mean... your neck will definitely feel it. **TL;DR:** Need to know if you prioritize wide-angle views or extra reach, and how much kit weight you can tolerate before suggesting a specific path!

Building on the earlier suggestion about the 18-150mm, I honestly think a two-lens combo is the way to go if you want peak performance without spending the full grand. I have been super satisfied using a versatile zoom paired with one fast prime for those low-light situations where the kit lenses struggle. Here is what has worked well for me while staying budget-friendly:

• Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM
• This lens is incredibly sharp and the IBIS on the R7 makes it a dream for handheld night shots.
• Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
• If you like architecture or wide vistas, this is tiny, cheap, and surprisingly good. I usually check the used listings on MPB or KEH before buying anything new. Ngl, you can often find "Like New" copies of these for 30% off retail, which is basically a steal. Since you have a $1000 budget, you could honestly grab both of these plus a used 18-150mm and have the ultimate travel kit for every possible scenario. The R7 sensor is picky with glass, but these primes really let it shine...

I tried the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM, but honestly, wasn't blown away. Autofocus had issues in low light. Consider renting before buying; saved me some regret!

Before blowing $1000, consider a used Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM with an adapter. They're readily available for around $500. It's a solid performer. Be careful; make sure the adapter is Canon-branded for optimal compatibility. I'd suggest testing it thoroughly before committing. You might want to consider professional cleaning if it's been stored for a while.

EOS R7's IBIS is amazing! Consider the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8. Super sharp, constant aperture is fantastic for video and low light. Technically, distortion correction profiles are key with zooms; ensure your software supports them. Before pushing limits, get pro advice on lens weight vs. mount stress – better safe than sorry!

Consider Tamron; weather-sealed builds last. Make sure the lens hood is ALWAYS attached for protection.

Tamron's zooms are consistently rated well. Check reviews; many under $800. Safe travels!