> R50 macro lens recommendations needed! Budget is around $500. Ok so weve talked about extension tubes, those older EF 100mm lenses with adapters, and even the Tamron 90mm. Tbh, as someone whos been messing around with macro for a few years now (and still feels like I'm a beginner some days!), I think the adapter route can make the R50 feel a bit bulky. Its such a tiny camera to put a big heavy lens on. If you want to stay under budget and keep it light, have you looked at the Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO? Its made specifically for APS-C sensors like yours. Its manual focus, which sounded super scary to me at first, but honestly, for macro work, I usually end up focusing manually or just moving the camera back and forth anyway. Its incredibly sharp for the price and gives you 2x magnification, which is way more than the standard 1:1. Ive had mine for a long time and it just works. Plus no adapter needed! Just something to think about if you want to save some money and skip the extra weight.

Did this last week, worked perfectly

Can confirm

Hey! Macro's tough. Unfortunately, my experience with the Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM wasn't stellar on my old EOS M. Not as sharp as I'd hoped. For your R50, maybe check out the used market for a Sigma 105mm. Heard great things, though I haven't used it personally. Might stretch the budget, but worth a look!

Consider extension tubes with your kit lens. Effective magnification boost; minimal cost. Sharpness will vary, but worth experimenting before buying a dedicated macro. MTF charts suggest decent results.

Before chasing ultimate sharpness, consider used options. Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM (with adapter) delivers excellent value. Be careful of cheaper, non-USM versions; focus accuracy matters for macro. Check lens condition thoroughly – fungus ruins images. I'd suggest inspecting in person if possible. Budget for a good cleaning if needed.

For your R50, consider Tamron's 90mm macro. Market analysis shows it often beats Canon's own at this price point! Amazing sharpness for the money, especially used.

Hey! Sharp macro is cool, but think about stability first, yeah? I've had issues with cheaper lenses causing camera shake. Unfortunately, not as good as expected in low light either. Maybe consider a used Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro IS USM with an adapter? Image stabilization helps a TON, especially when you're close up. Worth the investment for clearer, safer shots, I think!