lily.johnston is spot on about the autofocus hunting. I really wanted to love the adapted life but it was honestly such a letdown for me. I picked up the Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS M thinking I could just use my old glass, but the balance on the M50 was just... off. It felt front-heavy and clunky. Unfortunately, I also had some issues with third-party glass like the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary for Canon EF-M. While people rave about it, mine had this weird micro-jittering in video that I just couldnt fix. It was so frustrating to get home and see half my footage was slightly pulsed. Here is what I learned the hard way:
Tbh I went through a similar phase when I was starting out. I spent a lot of time worrying about overspending on gear before I actually knew what I liked to shoot. I'm always a bit cautious with my budget, so I spent weeks looking at used listings just to save a few bucks. A few things I noticed during my journey:
* Third-party adapters can be a bit finicky—I think some can cause connection issues, so I usually stick to name-brand for reliability.
* Weight balance is something I didn't think about at first, but a heavy setup can be a pain for long vlogging sessions.
* Not sure but I heard that some older glass might hunt more for focus in low light compared to the newer native stuff. I mean, it's a bit of a gamble either way. I'm still trying to figure out if the extra bulk of an adapter is really worth the savings in the long run, but it definitely felt like a safer entry point for my wallet at the time.
Noted!
Im honestly in the exact same boat right now and it's so frustrating. I've spent way too much time trying to find a setup that doesn't feel like a total compromise but everything I've tried has had some kind of issue.
So basically, the choice is between sticking to native EF-M glass or taking the leap into adapting EF lenses. Honestly, I’m always a bit wary of using adapters, especially if you're planning on doing a lot of vlogging. I think I heard somewhere that the autofocus can be a bit more "hunt-y" or less reliable when you aren't using glass made specifically for the M-series??? Not sure if that's just a rumor or if it’s been improved with firmware, but IIRC, staying native usually means fewer glitches and better communication with the camera body. Tbh, idk if it's worth the potential headache of dealing with connection errors or added bulk when you're just starting out. I just value reliability over everything else—if your gear misses focus during a great shot, it’s a huge pain!!! Adapting is a cool concept, but it basically adds another point of failure with those extra pins. For me, staying within the native ecosystem is just the safer bet for peace of mind while you're still learning the ropes.
The EF-M 32mm f/1.4 is a fantastic lens for portraits and low light, but it's pricey. Within your budget, the EF-M 22mm f/2 is a sharp, affordable alternative. Adapting EF lenses opens more options, like the nifty fifty (EF 50mm f/1.8 STM), offering great value. Consider your shooting style. For vlogging, the 22mm might be wider and more practical.