Hey everyone! I'm looking to upgrade my Canon RF lens collection and wondering what you'd recommend as the best value RF lens in 2025. I shoot mostly portraits and landscapes, with a budget around $800-1200. I've been eyeing the RF 50mm f/1.8 and RF 24-105mm f/4, but open to other suggestions. What's giving you the most bang for your buck lately? Thanks!
Depends on what you're shooting, but for telephoto on a budget, the Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS STM lens offers a useful telephoto zoom range, from 100mm to 400mm, whilst being competitively priced at just $649 / £699 – great value for money, and also the smallest, and lightest 100-400mm lens currently available. Sure, it's not the fastest lens, but for wildlife and sports in good light, it's hard to beat at that price point.
Honestly, after having a couple of lenses from other brands just totally stop communicating with my body mid-shoot, I kinda became a stickler for reliability. Basically, I realized that for the stuff I do, I'd rather spend a bit more on something that I know isn't gonna fail when the weather turns. My journey with the RF mount really started when I decided to prioritize those professional-tier builds because I just got tired of worrying about dust and moisture. * Native compatibility is just way more stable and less glitchy
* The weather sealing on the high-end glass is actually legit
* They just feel like they can take a beating in the field Anyway, so basically, if you have the budget, I’d say just go with any of the pro-grade stuff from Canon. You honestly can't go wrong once you step into that higher bracket of build quality, and it’ll save you the headache of things breaking down the road.
For pure value, I'd have to go with the Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS Macro STM - it's one of the best-value and most versatile lenses for the RF mount. It's pocket friendly in terms of price and size, this super compact lens is packed with features, from stabilization to light macro capability. At around $500-550, you get a fast prime that's great for street photography, portraits, and even macro work. The focal length is incredibly versatile and the image stabilization is a huge bonus for handheld shooting.
Saw this earlier but just now getting a chance to reply. To add to the point above about reliability, I would suggest being extremely cautious when looking at the more budget-friendly side of the line, especially if you plan on shooting landscapes in unpredictable weather. People often overlook the lack of weather sealing on the entry-level glass until they are caught in a drizzle. Make sure to watch out for these common pitfalls:
Can vouch for this