Which lens is best ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Which lens is best for bird photography on a Canon EOS R7?

3 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
34 Views
0
Topic starter

I just got this Canon EOS R7 and honestly I am so overwhelmed with all the buttons and settings. My husband got it for me because I've been getting really into watching the cardinals and blue jays in our backyard here in Ohio and he thought it would be a nice hobby for me. The thing is it came with a little lens that doesn't really zoom in very far at all so the birds just look like tiny little dots in the middle of the grass. I want to get closer but I have no idea what I'm looking for when I go on the website and see all these numbers like 100-400 or 600mm or f11. It's all just gibberish to me honestly lol. I tried to look it up on YouTube but everyone uses such technical words and I just feel more lost than when I started.

I'm trying to be thoughtful about this because lenses are super expensive and I dont want to waste money on something that won't work for what I want. I'm hoping to take some photos of the hawks that hang out near the lake near my house too so I probably need something that can see really far away. I'm not really sure if I need a prime lens or a zoom lens, someone told me prime is better but then I cant change how close I am? That sounds really hard for a beginner to use if the bird moves.

Here are my main things I'm looking for:

  • Budget: I really need to stay under 1200 dollars since the camera was already a big investment for us.
  • Weight: I have some wrist issues so I dont want a giant heavy cannon that I cant hold steady for more than a minute.
  • Distance: I want to see the feathers on a bird from maybe 30 or 40 feet away if that's even possible.
  • Ease of use: Something that just works with the camera without me having to buy five other parts or adapters.

I saw some people talking about RF versus EF lenses and that just confused me more because then people said I need an adapter? Does that make the picture worse or slower? Sorry if these are really basic questions I just feel a bit lost looking at all the options and I want to get something soon because we are going to the Smoky Mountains next month and I want to be ready to catch some cool wildlife shots...


3 Answers
12

To add to the point above: I completely agree that the 100-400 is your best bet, mainly because the other options are honestly kind of disappointing for a beginner. I tried using the Canon RF 600mm f/11 IS STM for a while and unfortunately it was just too dark for anything in the shade. It was a total letdown when I couldnt get a clear shot of a woodpecker just because the sun went behind a cloud. Since you're watching the budget, here are a few thoughts:

  • Skip the older EF lenses. People say they're cheaper but once you buy the Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R, you're spending more money for a heavier setup that will hurt your wrists.
  • Look for the Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM on the official refurbished site... usually saves a ton of cash.
  • Dont worry about buying filters or extra bits yet. It really sucks how technical this hobby gets, but once you're in the Smoky Mountains you'll love it. Just stick to the native RF stuff and you wont have to mess with extra parts.


11

Coming back to this, I totally get the frustration with all those numbers. I remember my first birding trip thinking my zoom was broken because every cardinal looked like a tiny red speck in my photos... we all start somewhere. Regarding what #1 said about "Get the Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM....", I really think that is your winner. I have spent years lugging around heavy gear and my wrists still hate me for it, but this specific lens is surprisingly light. Here is how I would weigh your options based on what I have used:

  • Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM: Pros: Extremely light and easy on the wrists. It zooms, so you can find the bird easily. Cons: Might feel a little short for those hawks across a big lake.
  • Canon RF 600mm f/11 IS STM: Pros: Amazing reach for the price. Cons: It is a prime lens so you cant zoom out, which makes finding a moving bird way harder for a beginner. Honestly, go with the 100-400. It is way easier to learn on and wont hurt your hands after ten minutes of holding it up.


2

Share:
Forum.CanonRumors.CO is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.