Which RF to EF adap...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Which RF to EF adapter is best for Canon mirrorless cameras?

6 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
230 Views
0
Topic starter

Hey everyone! I finally took the plunge and upgraded my setup from an old Canon DSLR to the EOS R6 Mark II. I’m absolutely loving the mirrorless experience so far—the autofocus is just mind-blowing—but I’ve run into a bit of a dilemma regarding my glass. I have a pretty solid collection of EF lenses, including my favorite 70-200mm f/2.8L and a Sigma 35mm Art, that I’m just not ready to trade in for RF versions yet. My budget is a bit tight after the body purchase, so I need to make my old lenses work perfectly.

I’ve been doing some deep-dive research on RF to EF adapters, and honestly, I’m feeling a bit overwhelmed by the choices. Canon has their own lineup, but even within that, there are three different models. Is the basic, no-frills adapter enough for everyday shooting, or is it really worth spending the extra cash on the one with the Control Ring? I like the idea of having an extra dial for ISO or aperture, but I’m wondering if it actually feels natural in practice or if it just makes the lens setup feel too long and bulky.

Also, I’ve been eyeing the version with the Drop-in Filter mount. It seems like a total lifesaver for my wide-angle lenses that have bulbous front elements where I can't easily attach a circular polarizer. However, it’s a big jump in price, and I’m worried about whether it might introduce any light leaks or dust issues.

Then there are the third-party options from brands like Viltrox or Meike. They are significantly cheaper, but I’m terrified of having 'mount wiggle' or losing that lightning-fast eye-tracking performance. I’ve heard mixed things about whether the weather sealing holds up on the cheaper ones too.

For those of you who have made the switch to the R-system, which adapter did you settle on? If you went with a third-party brand, have you noticed any communication errors or autofocus lag compared to the native Canon ones?


6 Answers
11

Curious about one thing: are you shooting mostly stills or video with that Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art? Communication protocols get kinda tricky with third-party glass on the R6II. Jumping in here... I've used the R-system for years and, honestly, some budget solutions were not as good as expected. I've had issues with signal drops during critical shoots. * Viltrox EF-R2 Mount Adapter: It gives you a control ring cheap, but unfortunately, the build is inconsistent. I've experienced "mount wiggle" which is basically a nightmare for AF consistency.
* Canon Drop-In Filter Mount Adapter EF-EOS R with Variable ND Filter: The premium choice. Pros: No light leaks and helps with wide glass. Cons: Very expensive and exposes the sensor to dust when swapping. I'd probably avoid the ultra-cheap Meike MK-EFTR-A Mount Adapter if you want real weather sealing. gl!


10

sooo i totally get the struggle! ive been shooting with the R system for ages and moved my whole EF kit over. ngl, the R6II autofocus is AMAZING. since ur on a budget, dont overthink it! heres how i see the adapter game:
- Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R: basic, bulletproof, no frills. usually around $99. it *just works*.
- Viltrox EF-R2 Control Ring Mount Adapter: costs like $60. you get that ring for way less than Canons version.
- Meike MK-EFTR-A EF to EOS R Adapter: the cheapest option, usually under $50. honestly, i find the control ring kinda awkward on longer lenses anyway. for that 70-200mm, id DEFINATELY stick with the Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R. some third-party ones have a tiny bit of mount wiggle that feels sketchy with heavy glass. basically, the basic Canon one is the sweet spot for reliability without breaking the bank. gl! 👍


4

sooo i totally get the struggle! i've been shooting with my R-series bodies for a few years now and honestly, that budget squeeze after buying a new body is REAL. i remember being so stressed about my EF glass not performing right. Here is how I see the budget options vs the pricey Canon ones: 1. Viltrox EF-EOS R Mount Adapter: this is basically the gold standard for budget adapters. i've used it with a heavy 70-200mm and didnt notice any 'mount wiggle' at all. it feels reallyyy solid. For your Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art, it should talk to the R6II just fine, tho sometimes third-party glass gets a tiny bit twitchy in video mode compared to stills. 2. Meike MK-EFTR-C Drop-in Filter Mount Adapter: if ur eyeing that drop-in filter life but cant justify the Canon price tag, this is it. i mean, it actually comes with the variable ND filter included usually. I was worried about dust too, but as long as you keep the filter seated, its fine. its a total lifesaver for wide lenses with those bulbous front elements. 3. Commlite CM-EF-EOS R Mount Adapter: if you want the absolute cheapest way to get shooting, this works. but honestly, the weather sealing isnt really there. i'd probably spend the extra $20 for the Viltrox just for peace of mind. tbh, the Control Ring is cool, but since the R6II has so many dials already, you can just map ISO to one of the existing wheels and save your cash. i'd say go with a solid third-party one and put the savings toward an RF lens down the road. good luck! 👍


3

> I’ve been doing some deep-dive research on RF to EF adapters, and honestly, I’m feeling a bit overwhelmed by the choices. Tbh, I spent weeks doing the exact same research when I picked up my R-series body. When youre hanging a heavy lens like that 70-200mm f/2.8L off a brand new sensor, the mechanical stress on the mount is a legitimate concern. I looked into the Commlite CM-EF-EOS R Mount Adapter and even some of the more niche ones like the Fotodiox Pro Lens Mount Adapter for Canon EF to RF, but my market research kept pointing back to one major thing: weather sealing. Basically, most third-party options skip the rubber gasket at the mount. If youre shooting outdoors or in dusty spots, thats a huge risk for an R6II. I also checked out the Metabones Canon EF to RF Mount T Smart Adapter because they have a great reputation in the mirrorless world, but they are actually pricier than the Canon ones. Honestly, from a reliability standpoint, the basic Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R is the safest bet because the tolerances are perfect. I’ve seen too many reports of mount wiggle with budget brands after a few months of heavy use. Just isnt worth the risk to save a few bucks if it ends up letting moisture in or losing signal during a shoot.


3

Good to know!


2

Ok adding this to my list of things to try. Thanks for the tip!


Share:
Forum.CanonRumors.CO is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.