Hey everyone! I finally made the leap into the mirrorless world and picked up a Canon R6 Mark II. I’m absolutely loving the autofocus and the body ergonomics, but I’m currently staring at my shelf full of EF glass—specifically my 24-70mm f/2.8L II and my 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III—and realizing I need to make a decision on an adapter ASAP.
I’ve narrowed it down to the two main Canon options: the standard Mount Adapter EF-EOS R and the Control Ring version. There’s about a $100 price difference between them here, and I’m trying to figure out if that extra investment actually translates to a better shooting experience in the field, or if it’s just one of those 'nice to have' features that ends up being ignored.
For those of you who went with the Control Ring version, how do you find the placement? Since the ring is located right at the mount, does it feel natural to use, or do you find yourself accidentally bumping it while trying to focus? I’m really intrigued by the idea of mapping it to ISO or Exposure Compensation—essentially giving my old EF lenses that 'third dial' functionality that the native RF lenses have. It seems like it could really speed up my workflow for event photography where lighting changes fast.
On the flip side, is the basic adapter more rugged? I’ve heard some people say the control ring can feel a bit 'clicky' and they prefer the simplicity of the basic one, especially if they already have enough dials on the camera body itself. I'm also slightly worried about weather sealing—does the control ring mechanism add a point of failure for moisture or dust compared to the solid build of the basic one?
I’d love to hear from anyone who has used both. Is the muscle memory easy to learn, or should I just save the $100 and put it toward a native RF prime later down the road? Which one did you choose and why?
Totally agree with the above! Ngl I had the Canon Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R and it was pretty disappointing... the ring felt kinda flimsy and I actually had issues with it getting gritty after a dusty shoot. Since ur shooting with heavy pro glass like the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM, you really dont want that extra mechanical failure point in your setup. My tip: stick with the basic Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R because it's literally just a solid tube with contacts—way less to go wrong with weather sealing or electronics. Plus, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II already has three dials, so adding a fourth one usually just leads to accidental bumps during fast-paced shoots. Save the cash and keep your kit simple and reliable... simple is always better for serious field work.
tbh i've used both and i'd suggest just getting the Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R. the Canon Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R is cool, but i found myself bumping the ring way too often during shoots. plus, the R6II already has plenty of dials. so basically, save that extra $100 and put it toward a Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM instead!!! it's just a better value imo.
Saw this today and had to jump in because honestly, the Canon brand adapters are way overpriced for what they actually do. Before you pull the trigger though, what kind of conditions are you usually shooting in for these events? If you arent constantly stuck in rain or mud, you might want to consider some third-party stuff and save that cash for glass. I would suggest looking at these instead: