So I finally pulled the trigger on the R5 Mark II but now I am freaking out because my trip to Kyoto is in three weeks and I have zero lenses. I spent way more than planned on the body so my budget is thin maybe $1500 max for glass. I am torn between getting the 24-105mm f4L because it's light or just biting the bullet for the 24-70mm 2.8 for low light stuff at night but its so heavy. Is the 24-105 gonna look soft on this sensor? I want one lens for street stuff and landscapes while we are hiking. Which one would you grab if you only had one spot in your bag...
Coming back to this... Kyoto is incredible but you really need to be careful about your back if you're walking all day. Since that R5 II sensor is so high-res, you might want to consider how much edge sharpness you're willing to sacrifice for convenience. If I were in your shoes with a strict $1500 limit, I would suggest a more methodical approach to your kit than just one massive lens.
Honestly, I had issues with the Canon RF 24-105mm f4L IS USM being a bit soft at the edges on high-res sensors. Its unfortunately not as sharp as I expected for an L lens. But the Canon RF 24-70mm f2.8L IS USM is way over budget and heavy. Id grab the 24-105 for the range, even if it feels like a compromise. Youll need that reach in Kyoto.
To add to the point above: I've been very satisfied with my choice to prioritize reliability. I once bought glass that couldnt handle a high-res sensor and it was basically a waste of a trip. A few cautions:
Facts.