I totally agree with the suggestions above. Ngl, when you're just starting, you really want something that's gonna be reliable and not give you a bunch of technical headaches. I’ve always found that the entry-level models are a bit 'safer' for beginners who might be a little rough on their gear. Here’s why I think that’s the right call:
* Fewer complex internal components that could potentially glitch out.
* They have a proven track record for being solid daily drivers. Not 100% sure on the exact shutter life ratings, but those models just seem to work without much fuss, which is huge for peace of mind. Tbh, it's better to have something dependable than a fancy camera you're afraid to actually use!

@Reply #4 - good point! Totally agree that keeping things simple is key when you're just starting out. I've been super satisfied with my setup lately, no complaints at all... but I'm gonna offer a slightly different take. While the RF system is user-friendly, those entry-level bodies can feel a bit plasticky. If you're worried about gear holding up, sometimes looking at older mid-range gear from other brands gives you a more solid, reliable feel for the same price. Just something to consider if you're a bit rough on your stuff like I am. TL;DR: RF is easy to use, but compare the build quality to older gear from other brands if you want something that feels like a tank.

Canon EOS R50 V.

100% agree

Following

Nice, didn't know that

Can vouch for this

R100.