So Ive been spending way too much time lately out at the wetlands near my house trying to get clear shots of the local ospreys with my Canon 90D. The problem is my current setup is basically a wet noodle. Im using this old thrift store tripod and even with the 100-400mm lens mounted on the collar it just shakes if I even breathe near it. Im losing so many sharp shots because of the micro-jitters.
I did some digging online and saw a lot of people recommending the Manfrotto 055 series because its supposed to be super sturdy for heavier DSLRs. But then I read a few forum threads saying that carbon fiber is actually better for wildlife because it absorbs motor vibrations better than aluminum does. Im super torn because I dont want to spend $400 on something like a Benro or a Sirui carbon fiber model only to find out its too light and tips over in a gust of wind. Plus the 90D isnt exactly a mirrorless featherweight.
I need something that can handle the weight of the long lens without creeping but I also have to hike about two miles to get to my favorite spot so weight is a factor too. My budget is right around $350 max. Is carbon fiber actually stable enough for a 90D with a big zoom or should I just suck it up and carry the heavy aluminum stuff...
Carbon fiber is definitely stable enough for that setup, but you gotta be careful with the thinner legs. I would suggest looking at options without a center column for maximum rigidity.
> I read a few forum threads saying that carbon fiber is actually better for wildlife because it absorbs motor vibrations. Unfortunately, I had issues with aluminum legs like the Manfrotto 055 Aluminum 3-Section Tripod MT055XPRO3. The vibration dampening wasnt as good as expected for long lens work. Aluminum tends to ring like a tuning fork. I recommend the Benro Mach3 2 Series Carbon Fiber Tripod TMA28C for better absorption. Quick tip: hang your pack from the center hook for extra ballast in wind.